Hitler knew: proof from Wiki; Christianity and Nazis; Night and Fog; Kvaternik; Einsatzgruppen; “Special Treatment”

Equally we know precisely what Hans Frank, a leading Nazi in Poland, said in December 1941 when he openly talked of being told to ‘liquidate the Jews’ and so on. So certainly in my judgment, as I say, there is no ambiguity here at all, the evidence is simply overwhelming that the crime occurred and was sanctioned at the highest level. “
Rees, Auschwitz, BBC

national geographic
very disturbing footage of nazi murders
In the early days of World War II, British intelligence agencies began secretly recording conversations between German prisoners of war in the hope of acquiring information on technical advances. The information gathered was to be used in the war effort against Germany. Transcripts of these conversations, now declassified, represent a previously unknown or overlooked source of information about the Holocaust, providing evidence of individual German officers’ participation in and knowledge of war crimes. The fact that the transcripts of and reports on the monitored conversations were locked away for over thirty years after the end of the war supports the view that intelligence agencies placed a higher priority on maintaining the secrecy of their methods than on aiding the prosecution of war criminals.


Until November 1944, at which time the SS, on orders from Himmler, disabled the gas chambers that still functioned. The SS destroyed the remaining gassing installations as Soviet forces approached in January 1945.

Many perpetrators confessed to what they had done during the war, after it was over.


According to a summary of the report in the New York Times, one of the most harrowing messages codebreakers overlooked was intercepted on January 11 1943 and detailed the 1,274,166 Jews killed under Operation Reinhard at four death camps – Lublin, Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka – during 1942.

The report notes: “The message itself contained only the identifying letters for the death camps followed by the numerical totals.”

Bad Arolsen, German historical documentation ctr.


christopher browning, quotes on extermination policy.
Professor John Zimmermann, UNLV

He recounts how Heinrich Himmler, second in overall authority in the Third Reich, told Rudolf Hoess, Commandant of Auschwitz (27-28) that Hitler had ordered that all Jews within the Nazi reach must be annihilated.

The reliability of these memoirs can be tested by comparing them to independent corroborating evidence. All of the essential eyewitness testimony corroborates Höss’s memoirs on Auschwitz. ** Pery Broad, an SS man stationed at Auschwitz while Höss was the commandant, wrote of the gas chambers and crematoria in his memoirs. 12 Similarly, they are confirmed by the **diary kept by SS physician at Auschwitz Johann Kremer. 13 The post war testimony by victims and perpetrators at the **Belsen trial in 1947 of many guards who served at Auschwitz is further corroborating evidence. 14 There was also a great deal of victim and perpetrator testimony at the **Auschwitz trials in Frankfurt, Germany in the mid 1960s of 20 defendants who were stationed at the camp. 15

Furthermore, during his trial, SS-Obersturmbannführer Karl Adolf Eichmann, head of the department for Jewish Affairs in the Gestapo from 1941 to 1945, submitted that Reinhard Heydrich, head of the Reich Central Security Office, or RSHA (Reichssicherheitshauptamt) in charge of “carrying out the desired final solution of the Jewish question” informed him two or three months prior to Operation Barbarossa (22 June 1941) that Hitler had ordered the physical annihilation of the Jews.

Rudolf Hoess wrote in his autobiography that Obersturmbannführer Adolf Eichmann and his deputy were the only ones who knew the total number of Jews that were gassed at Auschwitz-Birkenau because Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler had ordered the records to be burned after every special action. The Nazis always used code words when talking about the genocide of the Jews: a mass gassing was called a “special action.”

The IBM Hollerith punch cards kept by the Germans for the Jews, Russians and Gypsies, who were registered in the camp and later killed in the gas chambers, were coded as F-6 for “special treatment” or as “evacuations” according to Edwin Black, the author of “IBM and the Holocaust.” The code for “execution” was D-4.

The following excerpt is from the deposition originally given to the British by Hoess:

In 1941 the first intakes of Jews came from Slovakia and Upper Silesia. People unfit to work were gassed in a room of the crematorium in accordance with an order which Himmler gave me personally.

**I was ordered to see Himmler in Berlin in June 1941 and he told me, approximately, the following:

The Fuhrer ordered the solution of the Jewish question in Europe. A few so called Vernichtungslager [extermination camps] are existing in the General Goverment:
Holocaust in Ukraine

Christopher Browning, Historian


More evidence that A. Hitler knew and ordered the Holocaust:

“The police units to be deployed by the Reichsfuehrer-SS on order of the Fuehrer.”

The Purpose of the Einsatzgruppen

The most succinct description of the purpose of the Einsatzgruppen was given at the trial of Adolph Eichmann by Dr. Michael Musmanno, Justice of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, who presided over the trial of 23 of the leaders of the Einsatzgruppen. He stated “The purpose of the Einsatzgruppen was to murder Jews and deprive them of their property.” SS General Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski confirmed this at the main Nuremberg Trial when he testified that “The principal task [of the Einsatzgruppen] was the annihilation of the Jews, gypsies, and political commissars.” (Taylor, Anatomy, p. 259)

The Einsatzgruppen were given orders directly by Himmler and Heydrich on several occasions. There were at least two meetings of the leaders of the Einsatzgruppen in June, 1941 in which they were briefed as to their duties. In a third meeting, which probably took place on June 22, 1941, Heydrich briefed the commanders on the plans for their operations. Otto Ohlendorf, commander of Einsatzgruppe D and a close associate of Himmler, confirmed these orders when he testified at the Nuremberg Trial:

On March 13, 1941, Gen. Keitel, the commander of the OKW, issued a supplement to Barbarossa which discussed special tasks, independent of the military needs of the invasion, that would be supervised by Himmler.

There’s your proof.

Alan Bullock, “Hitler“, a biography [p 410). “Himmler organized the extermination of the Jews, but the man in whose mind so grotesque a plan had been conceived was Hitler.”


Hitler’s Conversation with Josef Hell, 1922

When Hell asked Hitler what he intended doing if he ever had full freedom of action against the Jews, his response was:

“If I am ever really in power, the destruction of the Jews will be my first and most important job. … (quoted in John Toland, Adolf Hitler. London: Book Club Associates, 1977, p.116)

Hitlers Weisungen fuer die Kreigfuehrung” [Hitler’s Directives for the Conduct of the War], edited by Walther Hubatsch, Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, Frankfurt am main, 1962, pp. 102-3, translation by Gord McFee.

The initial policy was orally communicated to the officers of the Einsatzgruppen. They were later embodied in the “Commissar Order” issued by Heydrich Himmler and never revoked. (Harris, 241) The Commisar Order issued on July 17, 1941, called for “the separation and further treatment of . . . . all Jews.” (TMWC IV 258-9)

The Einsatzgruppen were assisted by other Axis forces, including designated members of the Wehrmacht, including general Walther von Reichenau and the Waffen-SS.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einsatzgruppen

We shall then emphasize again that we were forced to occupy, administer and secure a certain area; it was in the interest of the inhabitants that we should provide order, food, traffic, etc., hence our measures. It should not be recognizable that thereby a final settlement is being initiated! We can nevertheless take all necessary measures—shooting, resettling, etc.—and we shall take them.

Bormann’s minutes on a talk by Hitler

Hitler’s order vis a vis the Soviet Union: Commissar’s Order. Himmler wrote that Jews would be ‘exterminated as partisans’ in his notes.



” He said: “Well, they’re to be shot in accordance with the FÜHRER’s orders. I said: “FÜHRER’s orders?” “Yes”, whereupon he showed me his orders. This happened at SKIOTAWA(?), 8 km. from RIGA, between SIAULAI and JELGAVA, where 5000 BERLIN Jews were suddenly taken off the train and shot.

“Hitler had all ordered all concentration camps to be destroyed before the Allies arrived”.
(Rees, Auschwitz, p. 269)
Hitler’s Diktat
Führer’s conversation in his headquarters with Croatian Marshal Kvaternik on 22 July 1941. Present: Foreign Affairs Reichsminister and Generalfeldmarshal Keitel.

Hitler speaking: ” The way it was done we know from the Lithuanian experience. On the second day when they [Soviets] entered there, in order to cleanse them, they ordered all shopkeepers to assemble on the street at 7 o’clock in the morning. Automatic weapons were positioned on street corners with which all of the people were killed; then the Jewish commissars took over the shops. Jews are the plague of mankind. Therefore now the Lithuanians, Estonians, and Latvians are wreaking bloody revenge on them. The Soviets from these countries deported children; it is to be noted and made clear that they did the same thing in their own regions.”(14)

Hitler’s gambit to conceal German role in the Holocaust is confirmed in Stahlecker’s reports.

Hitler’s conversation took place in a formal context – during a foreigner’s visit and in the presence of his two highest officials: Foreign Minister Ribbentrop and Fieldmarshal Keitel. This is about as official and high as it can get. Hitler was making state policy as he was propagandizing a guest. Considering the people present, we can say the policy was intended for both domestic and international consumption. But Hitler committed a misstep: he got entangled in his own prevarications. Estonia at the time was not as yet occupied. This means that Hitler’s monologue was a prepared propaganda package: the whole nine yards – his pronouncements about Jews, Russians, Mongols, and the Baltic peoples.

source: ://vip.latnet.lv/lpra/folklore.htm
Adolf Eichmann’s statement before an Israeli court in 1961 that he heard from Himmler that Hitler had given a verbal order for the Holocaust. source: The Eichmann memoirs.

The German historian Eberhard Jäckel wrote a series of newspaper articles later turned into the book David Irving’s Hitler: A Faulty History Dissected, attacking Irving and maintaining that Hitler was very much aware of and approved of the Holocaust. Jäckel attacked Irving for claiming that a note from Heinrich Himmler’s notebook – “Jewish transport from Berlin, not to be liquidated”, dated 30 November 1941 – proved that Hitler did not want to see the Holocaust happen.[52] Jäckel maintained that the order referred only to that train, and argued that if Hitler had ordered the people on that train to be spared, it must stand to reason that he was aware of the Holocaust.[52]

Jäckel went on to argue that because the “Final Solution” was secret, it is not surprising that Hitler’s servants were ignorant of the Holocaust, and that anyhow, five of Hitler’s servants interviewed by Irving later claimed that they believed that Hitler was aware of the Holocaust.[53]

Jäckel argued on the basis of Hitler’s statements in Mein Kampf that the Führer was always committed to genocide of the Jews, and that because Hitler later attempted to execute the foreign policy he outlined in Mein Kampf, it is a reasonable assumption that Hitler was always committed to genocide, which in Jäckel’s opinion disproves Irving’s claim that Hitler was unaware of the Shoah.[54] Jäckel used Hitler’s tendency to involve himself in minutiae to argue that it is simply inconceivable that Hitler was unaware of the Holocaust.[55] As evidence against Irving, Jäckel used Hitler’s “Prophecy Speech” of 30 January 1939 where Hitler declared:

“I shall once again be your prophet: if international Jewry with its financial power in and outside of Europe should manage once more to draw the peoples of the world into world war, then the result will not be the Bolshevization of the world, and thus the victory of Jewry, but rather the total destruction of the Jewish race in Europe.”[55]

Likewise, Jäckel used Himmler’s Posen speeches of 1943 and certain other statements on his part in 1944 referring to an “order” from an unnamed higher authority as proof that Hitler had ordered the Holocaust.[56] In the same way, Jäckel used Hitler’s order of 13 March 1941, ordering that the Einsatzgruppen be reestablished for Operation Barbarossa, as proof of the Führer’s involvement in the Holocaust.[57] Jäckel also cited the entry in Joseph Goebbels’s diary on 27 March 1942 – mentioning that the Führer’s “Prophecy” of 1939 was coming true – as a sign that Hitler had ordered the Holocaust, and accused Irving of dishonesty in claiming that there was no sign in the Goebbels’s diary that Hitler knew of the Holocaust.[58]

Finally, Jäckel noted the frequent references to the “Prophecy Speech” in Hitler’s wartime speeches as a sign that Hitler had ordered the Holocaust, thereby disproving Irving’s claim that Hitler was ignorant of the “Final Solution”.[59]

Jäckel wrote that he had “easily” discovered the “lost” document, in which the head of the Reich Chancellery, Hans Lammers, wrote to the Justice Minister Franz Schlegelberger that Hitler ordered him to put the “Jewish Question” on the “back-burner” until after the war.[60] Jäckel noted the document concerned was the result of a meeting between Lammers and Schlegelberger on 10 April 1942 concerning amendments to the divorce law concerning German Jews and Mischlinge.

Jäckel ended his essay arguing that the “lost” document in no way proved that Hitler was unaware of the Holocaust, and accused Irving of deceitfulness in claiming otherwise.

Sydnor commented that Hitler had received a SS report in November 1942 which contained a mention of 363,211 Russian Jews executed by the Einsatzgruppen between August-November 1942.

Sydnor accused Irving of selective quotation from the memoirs of Joachim von Ribbentrop, noting that Irving quoted the passage: “How things came to the destruction of the Jews, I just don’t know…But that he [Hitler] ordered it, I refuse to believe, because such an act would be wholly incompatible with the picture I always had of him”, but did not quote the next sentence where Ribbentrop wrote: “On the other hand, judging from his [Hitler’s] last will, one must suppose that he at least knew about it, if, in his fanaticism against the Jews, he didn’t also order it”. [my italics]

Hitler’s remark to the Czech foreign minister in January 1939 that “We are going to destroy the Jews!…The day of reckoning has come!”

Plus the broad hints that Hitler dropped in his speeches of 30 January 1941; 30 January 1942; 24 February 1942; 30 September 1942, and 8 November 1942 that he knew of the Holocaust[94] Finally, Craig cited Himmler’s remark of May 1944 where he stated he had orders from an unnamed higher authority (who Craig argued could only be Hitler) for the “Final Solution”.

In addition there is Hitler’s Speech to the Gauleiters, 12 Dec 1941.

Historian Lukacs called Irving’s historical opinions objectionable and inexcusable, and complained that too many of Irving’s opinions were supported by footnotes that referred either to sources that did not exist or said something different from what Irving wrote.

Goebbels’ Diary: (December 14, 1942): “The Jewish race has prepared this war; it is the spiritual originator of the whole misfortune that has overtaken humanity. Jewry must pay for its crime just as our Fuehrer prophesied in his speech in the Reichstag: namely, by the wiping out of the Jewish race in Europe and possibly in the entire world.” (pp. 243-244).

As late as March 7, 1942, Goebbels had still been entertaining a Final Solution that would send all European Jews to Madagascar (p. 116). In other entries, he was completely candid about the physical extermination of Jews (e. g., p. 86, 92; 243-244).

However, Jews were not the only scapegoats; nor were they the only ones blamed for starting WWII.

On April 17, 1943, Goebbels wrote: “… [Poles]…were the real instigators of this war….” (p. 332).

After Mussolini’s fall, Goebbels commented: “The plot hatched against us in Rome was backed by the monarchy, aristocracy, society, higher officers, Free Masons [Freemasons], Jews, industrialists, and clerics.” (p. 445). Nor were Jews necessarily the only ones supposed to be overly powerful. On April 30, 1942, Goebbels entertained fantasies of Poles being behind the panic of the Germans of Rostock following the devastating RAF attack (p. 197).

The first step in genocide is the denial of the humanity of those targeted. The well-known de-humanization of Jews extended to Slavs, as on January 27, 1942.


The translator Lochner (p. ix), based on some of Goebbels’s entries (p. 138, 142, 146, 375), contends that the Nazis intended to destroy Christianity after winning the war. Public crucifixes were removed (p. 141), and Hitler saw the Christian doctrine of redemption as insane (p. 375). Hitler also re-affirmed his support of vegetarianism (p. 188).


Nazis tried to alter Christian religion

Himmler on Christianity:
“We will have to deal with Christianity in a tougher way than hitherto. We must settle accounts with this Christianity, this greatest of plagues that could have happened to us in our history, which has weakened us in every conflict.”


Maniacal Hitler

Follow your leader


Disturbing Image, Mauthausen. Victims of the maniac.
Night and Fog

Field Marshall Wilhelm Keitel issued a letter stating: “Efficient and enduring intimidation can only be achieved either by capital punishment or by measures by which the relatives of the criminals do not know the fate of the criminal. The prisoners are, in future, to be transported to Germany secretly, and further treatment of the offenders will take place here; these measures will have a deterrent effect because – A. The prisoners will vanish without a trace. B. No information may be given as to their whereabouts or their fate.”

7 Dec 1941

[Thanks to Wikipedia for the quotes.] The basic idea of the Nacht und Nebel decree was to terrorize populations into submission. Any political, religious discontent, or disruption would be dealt with in a fury of mystery. Essentially, the ‘offender’ would vanish into the night and be shrouded in fog.



“There is a mass of evidence that the Nazis were determined to keep it secret, even developing euphemisms such as ‘resettlement policy’, ‘cleansing actions’, ‘final solution’, ‘transfer to the East’, ’special treatment’ , “evacuation” and so on to ensure that the population as a whole were unaware. Amongst many examples of the Nazi leadership exhorting secrecy and deception in this area, Himmler’s personal secretary, in a note to the Inspector for Statistics on 10 April 1943, made it clear that Himmler’s orders were ‘that no mention be made of the “special treatment of the Jews”. It must be called “transportation of the Jews towards the Russian East”.’**********************
(see also “Himmler, Hitler and the End of the War”, BBC documentary, Professor Ian Kershaw, in which this is shown: Part One”)

Even the term ’special treatment’ was seen as too explicit. Himmler was clearly worried that if the facts got out, there would be the potential for mass opposition. Indeed, even Der Sturmer, the most fanatical and pro-genocide of the Nazi publications, was stopped from publishing details of murders of Jews. ”

Hitler’s orders to starve Russians to death


Tags: , , ,

6 Responses to “Hitler knew: proof from Wiki; Christianity and Nazis; Night and Fog; Kvaternik; Einsatzgruppen; “Special Treatment””

  1. paolosilv Says:


  2. paolosilv Says:

    Halt! Stay!

    Young Jews, the living

    British Officer making the population view

    German goon stands over Jews as they emerge from a train

    Vice President Cheney and his daughter visit Auschwitz

  3. paolosilv Says:

    Arbeit macht frei

    drawing by? whom

    Imagine the coward who stood guard. Who was this anonymous piece of shit who stood watching while people were treated like less than humans, worse than cattle, at the manmade Hell? What mother brought this filth into the world?

  4. paolosilv Says:


    WASHINGTON — The federal court records read like variations on the same morality play sharing the same opening scene: A neighbor known as quiet and friendly is accused of Nazi war crimes, stunning residents of nearby bungalows or adjoining apartments.

    “He was always out ready to help his neighbors,” Kathy Blitch testified at the trial of Conrad Schellong, with whom she shared a back porch on Chicago’s Northwest Side.

    But Schellong, a retired machinist, was also among a number of concentration camp guards whose dark pasts caught up with them decades after they had bluffed their way into this country.

    Many lived in Chicago, where the ethnic patchwork made it easy to blend in among various displaced people rebuilding their lives after World War II. Having participated in the horrors of Auschwitz and Treblinka, former Nazis and their collaborators went on to live in quiet anonymity in Cicero and Schiller Park, Brookfield and Brighton Park.

    “The crimes were enormous,” said Peter Black, a historian with the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum who interviewed many deported Nazis for the U.S. Department of Justice. “But they themselves seemed so ordinary.”

    Now that the work of tracking down and deporting World War II criminals is drawing to a close—people of military age in the 1940s would now be in their late 80s or 90s—the Justice Department is transferring its trial records to the Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C.

    The transcripts, totaling thousands of pages, are an indelible reminder that genocide is not only the work of an obvious monster, an Adolf Hitler or an Idi Amin. From the Holocaust to Darfur, mass killing requires myriad accomplices, some otherwise indistinguishable from the people next door.

    Many of the people who were found, charged and deported were old men by the time justice caught up with them. It took 15 years of investigations, a trial and appeals to deport Liudas Kairys, who worked in the Cracker Jack factory on the Southwest Side.

    Some question whether the effort was worth the cost to taxpayers. But Eli Rosenbaum, who heads the Justice Department’s Office of Special Investigations, argues that it is an obligation to future generations.

    After Germany’s war-crimes trials in the 1950s, the issue of bringing former Nazis to justice dropped out of the public consciousness, Rosenbaum said. Then the media and Congress raised the question of ex-Nazis living in the U.S., which led to the founding of his office in 1979. In the interval, Rosenbaum asked, what deterrent prevented tyrants from thinking they could get away with genocide? To him, each of his office’s cases—22 were filed in the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse in Chicago, more than any other federal court—is a history lesson, as necessary as it is painful.

    Reading those lessons is doubly unsettling because of the transcripts’ present location. The Holocaust museum’s fifth-floor archives are accessible by an elevator whose gray, metallic walls deliberately evoke the grim atmosphere of a concentration camp.

    In the Holocaust museum’s lunchroom, the wooden tables are heavily scratched with initials and a heart or two—perhaps the handiwork of visiting school groups. But one stands out from the rest, its inscription re-enforced with graphite or ink:


    Remember the 6,000,000.

    Conrad Schellong

    Lived in Portage Park, Chicago.

    Deported to West Germany in 1988.

    “I was only a soldier,” Schellong wrote on his 1957 application for a U.S. visa. He neglected to elaborate: He belonged to the SA, a formation of street thugs that orchestrated the Kristallnacht pogroms of 1938, smashing Jewish store windows and beating German Jews.

    “I just forgot about the SA, was so many things happened in between war and everything, I just forgot,” he testified at his 1984 trial, when he was 74.

    The prosecutor reminded Schellong that when filling out his Immigration papers he did recall belonging to a soccer club in pre-war Germany.

    “Yes,” Schellong replied, “because all life I have played soccer from 11 years to practically until I was 20, 21.”

    At his trial, a fellow Chicagoan, Bruno Bettelheim, testified by videotape to the brutalities of Dachau, where he’d been an inmate and Schellong was a guard. By Schellong’s account, the famed child psychologist and other survivors got it wrong: Guards were forbidden to mistreat prisoners, who mostly were common criminals.

    How about the Jews? Schellong was asked.

    “We were told that most of those Jews were taken in custody for their own protection,” Schellong explained.

    Reinhold Kulle

    Lived in west suburban Brookfield.

    Deported to West Germany in 1987.

    Kulle served in a SS Death’s Head battalion, a unit of concentration camp guards, but he claimed he’d been in the regular German Army for fear the truth would deny him admission to the U.S.

    “I think I lied to the American government,” Kulle told a Justice Department lawyer in a pre-trial interview. “And I feel sorry, sorry about this.”

    When Kulle went on trial in 1983, the case against him was circumstantial, as concentration camps left few witnesses to what went on there.

    So a defense attorney’s strategy was to offer testimony that the defendant was mild-mannered, not at all a war-criminal type. Character witnesses included several faculty members of Oak Park and River Forest High School, where Kulle had been a custodian.

    The head of the high school’s theater department was asked if he thought Kulle, 56 at the time, was capable of brutal and wanton violence.

    “I under no circumstances [could] ever visualize Reinhold being involved in anything like that,” James Eitrheim replied.

    On cross-examination, Eitrheim was asked if learning of his colleague’s wartime service had changed his opinion.

    “If I understand correctly, the SS was thousands of men,” Eitrheim replied. “And I kind of refuse to believe that all people in any organization are identical.”

    Bronislaw Hajda

    Lived in west suburban Schiller Park.

    Ordered deported in 1997. Died in 2005 before order was carried out.

    After coming to the Chicago area, Hadja raised roses and petunias, shared the produce of his vegetable gardens and worked for 22 years for the Continental Can factory.

    “A former guard at a notorious Nazi concentration camp living as a neighbor?” a federal appeals judge asked, pondering his case. “Most people in Schiller Park, a Chicago suburb, might have thought things like this happen only in places like Argentina, not in America.”

    The government accused the Polish-born Hadja, a cobbler before the war, of being among the Eastern Europeans recruited into auxiliary SS units.

    Hadja, then 73, countered that he couldn’t have been a guard at Treblinka, since the Gestapo had held him prisoner in another concentration camp.

    But his testimony had a false ring.

    At his 1997 trial, an expert witness described to the court the torture practiced in the camps.

    At one point he was asked to explain a term he had used, “the last waltz.”

    The phrase, he said, was camp shorthand for harnessing inmates to a gigantic paving roller, then working and beating them to death.

    Yet Hadja still denied that concentration camp prisoners—as he claimed to have been—were harmed there.

    “Did you ever see a German soldier kill anybody?” Hadja’s attorney asked.

    “Also, no,” he replied.

    Juozas Naujalis

    Lived in west suburban Cicero.

    Deported to Lithuania in 2001.

    At his 1996 trial, Naujalis spoke not one word in his own defense. His lawyer explained that the retired machinist, a Cicero resident, was too ill with cancer to come to court, and his son testified that Naujalis, then 76, was mentally confused and under psychiatric care.

    The government produced identity papers showing that Naujalis had served in a Lithuanian auxiliary battalion that assisted German forces on killing missions, during which 11,000, men, woman and children were murdered, many of them Jews.

    His lawyer attacked the veracity of the government’s evidence, noting it was among documents reportedly seized by the Soviets at the war’s end, then deposited in Lithuanian archives. Didn’t the court know the Russians were expert forgers? Naujalis, the lawyer said, was the victim of a disinformation campaign designed to stir bad blood between Jews and Lithuanians.

    The government successfully asked the judge to weigh the assumption behind that argument.

    “This presupposes the Soviets, back in the ’60s or whenever, said, ‘There is a fellow named Jouzas Naujalis in Chicago. Let’s try to smear him,’ ” the Justice Department attorney said. “Why the KGB would be in the least bit interested in Mr. Naujalis is beyond me.”

  5. paolosilv Says:


    list of female nazi ss guards

  6. Treuhandliste Says:

    Directory of swiss finance assist companies…

    Hitler knew: proof from Wiki; Christianity and Nazis; Night and Fog; Kvaternik; Einsatzgruppen; “Special Treatment” « Paolosilv's Blog…

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: